Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Development of technology has led to an increase in job opportunities and has provided jobholders with various options for their working hours. While a proportion of people maintain that working for three days with extended hours is more enjoyable, I hold a different view, believing that more working days with shorter hours is more profitable for people. This essay will explore a couple of reasons supporting my perspective in the following paragraphs.
First of all, spending an extremely long time in the workplace can be significantly tedious and exhaust the employees; thus, they may need long hours to rest, which can counter the noteworthy effects of more holidays. To put it in other words, long hours of working is substantially energy-consuming. Therefore, workers require spending a large quantity of time to regain the energy they need to accomplish their tasks. This enormous amount of energy could be recharged by allocating more time in comparison with people who work for standard working hours. Hence, they may be expected to put aside a large amount of their holiday to balance their energy, which means that they actually will not have as many off days as they assume at the first place. In fact, they need to rest to a larger extent on their weekends. On the contrary, when people work for fewer hours, they can save a considerable amount of energy to do their personal tasks and have a rest before the new strenuous day. Thus, they can survive more simply during the week and have the chance to take the most advantage of their weekend.
Secondly, being absent for a couple of days, people may forget the details of the tasks they have performed resulting in lower productivity and performance. In other words, employees usually try to carry out a piece of work in their workplace, then leave it behind and proceed to have their holiday. After they return to their offices, they may not be able to remember everything; thus, they need time to focus and examine the contrasting aspects of their task. This procedure may take long hours, which in turn can affect the amount of work that an employee is able to accomplish. This approach can lead to serious poor outcomes for the employee and the entire company. Besides, the sense of poor performance and not being persuasively productive can influence the overall happiness and self-gratitude of the employees. Accordingly, they may easily lose their motivation and inspiration to work more competently and provide more effective and outstanding pieces of work.
On the whole, taking all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I believe that more working days with shorter hours have several benefits compared to fewer working days with longer hours. Not only will this approach help employees to become less exhausted during the week, but it also can help them to be more productive and exhibit a remarkable performance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in fact, first of all, in other words, on the contrary, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02066115702 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74727435694 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487603305785 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0224642305 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256875618997 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884450017843 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810868979409 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201667955984 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794703867271 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.