Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
No one can deny the significant role of friends in our life. They give us support and eliminate our loneliness. I agree with the statement that it is critical maintaining our relationship with old friends than exploring new affiliations. Friendship is measured always with quality not the quantity or number. Also, old friends are trusted more than the new companions, and getting to know new friends is time- consuming.
First, Friendship is graded by quality, not by the numbers. We can have just one or two good friends and feel completely satisfied. On the other hand, we can have tons of useless, unsupportive and nonloyal friends and feel entirely alone. Friends have roles in our life need to be fulfilled. If we do not have a mutual balanced relationship with them, so there is no reason to waste our precious time in this kind of relationship. For example, last year, I had a major problem with my husband, I felt very lost and was crying non-stop. Therefore I called my relatively new friend to comfort me in this hard situation. But she was not supportive at all as she did not show any sympathy, or offered any guidance on how to solve my problem. I felt so lonely, and I decided to end our friendship.
Secondly, Our old friends are more trusted than new people. Trust is really important factor as we get really engaged with our friends. We invite them to come over. Also, we share with them many personal details. If they are not trusted enough, we will be completely unsafe around them. For example, I had a work situation last month. I had to leave my son with my friend for a few hours. When I decided which one I could trust to accompany my son, I chose the oldest friend I know, because I know her in and out for a long time. My long experience with her validated my decision.
Finally, making new friends is a long process it needs a lot of time and energy. We need at least couple of yeas to call a new person a friend.
Once we accomplish that, we should maintain this relation. We need to preserve what we achieved with our old friends and build on this bond that we created with them.
In conclusion, I believe that we all should maintain our link with our old friends instead of making new friends. This will make our life more efficient and minimize the time and the energy . Also, it will ensure good quality of friends, and feel safer among them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significant role of friends in our life, as they give us support and eliminate ou...
^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Also, old friends are trusted more than the new companions,and getting to know n...
^^
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...re trusted more than the new companions,and getting to know new friends is a really...
^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...felt very lost and was crying non-stop. Therefore I called my relatively new friend to co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... We need at least couple of yeas to call a new person a friend. Once we accompli...
^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ient and minimize the time and the enegy . Also, it will ensure good quality of fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52027027027 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54701431265 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495495495495 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8669455883 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.6785714286 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10714285714 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248305158407 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781366308468 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773662283068 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157514771589 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760053367987 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.