Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
No one can cast that on the fact that different people have different thinking caps, so, it is rational that two people have opposite viewpoints about a certain subject. The controversial question which arises here is whether, following news from a person with different perspective from us is more important than following them from a person with similar view we have. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that listening to different viewpoints about a certain subject is more beneficial for people. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that watching news presented by people who has different perspective from us, provides us with the golden opportunity to look at that event from a different angel of view which is very beneficial and help us to broaden our hirizon. Moreover, people with different view from us may reveal some aspects of new which stay hidden from our mind, so by these opportunity we can consider the sitution more accurately, in consequence we will end up making the best decision about that event. For example, a couple of years ago, after happening an earthquake in a city in our country, I just follow the news from social medias that were against the governmet and all of them saied that the government should help people instead of obseving the situation. That make me to have a bad idea about the government, but, after I started watching news from the television I saw that the government is trying to help people overcome the hurdles in many different ways, as a result, that help me to change my idea about the government and judge in more accurate way.
Another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that although listenin to opposite viewpiont is not a satisfied approach for people, it increases their awareness about the situation they are living. It goes without saying that, people' life is closely related to the environment where they live, as well as, people they are living with. Having different viewpoints will end up creating some difficult situation for people which may not be desire for them and encouter them with serious problem, on the other hand, being aware about different perspectives which people, aroun them, have, they can prepare themselves for any unexpected situations and in some cases they can prevent some catastrophe from happening.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that, keeping track of news proposed by people whose views differ from us is an important approach that should be done by all people. The fact that, they can enlarge their information by being aware about different aspects of a certain subject, coupled with helping them for every future problems may be occured, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this opportunity' or 'these opportunities'?
Suggestion: this opportunity; these opportunities
... which stay hidden from our mind, so by these opportunity we can consider the sitution more accur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1003, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... to help people overcome the hurdles in many different ways, as a result, that help me to chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, for example, in short, as a result, as well as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 30.0 11.0286738351 272% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92827868852 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61427789358 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493852459016 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6096372646 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.0 100.406767564 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5384615385 20.6045352989 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199841987496 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804297003186 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068776364508 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132200161734 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567520714607 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 11.7677419355 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 58.1214874552 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.1575268817 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.