Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the progressive world where we live, people always are looking for reliable, loyal, and good friends who they can rely on them in tough situation they encounter. In this regard, many thinks they should make new friends as much as possible, others, however, hold the view that they should keep their old friends and strengthen the basis of their old friendships efficiently. I, for two main reasons, subscribe to the latter group which I will elaborate on them in the following paragraphs.
One exquisite reason which comes to mind is that people usually grow up with their old friends. They definitely have so many similar experience with one another which this provides them with a sense of intimation as gradually they will turn into each other’s family member. Apparently, new friends have not had a key role in one another’s previous life, therefore, it would be difficult to make a deep emotional relationship with them. To put it in another words, I have an old friend whom I spent a large part of my life with her, since elementary school to university. Nonetheless, at university I made some new friends that I hung out with them. Despite the fact that my new friends claimed to be loyal and reliable, whenever I had some problems, my old friend back me up without any expectation.
Second, it is clearly that if two persons are old friends they have had a lots in common. If people have similar interests, similar goals, and ambitions in their life they are more likely to get along very well, and it guarantee their long lasting relationship. Many psychological studies revealed that people who have many things in common have a better influence on each other because they enjoy spending time with one another. However, since new ones have not spent a great amount of time together, it is less likely to be matched very well and have quality time in tandem. For example, when my friend and I spend time with together we talk about anything and we have a good understand of one another’s points of view. Nevertheless, when I want to talk with my new friends about my ideas, it always leads to an exhaustive debate and makes me disappointed.
All in all, considering the two mentioned reasons into account, I firmly assert that caring about our old friendship is a priority in our life because in this way not only do we have some intimated one around ourselves, but also we have the chance of making better time with old friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experience seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much similar experience', 'a good deal of similar experience'.
Suggestion: much similar experience; a good deal of similar experience
...ir old friends. They definitely have so many similar experience with one another which this provides th...
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: A_PLURAL
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...o persons are old friends they have had a lots in common. If people have similar inter...
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'guarantees'?
...e likely to get along very well, and it guarantee their long lasting relationship. Many p...
Line 4, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...es have not spent a great amount of time together, it is less likely to be matche...
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...of making better time with old friends.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73598130841 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62253527776 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518691588785 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8734015084 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6875 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194774062838 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779880123233 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452916869875 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128479085212 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386006382609 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.