Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Our society intricate with too many issues and problems every day. To solve the situation and direct a whole society to a valid solution, a person needs to step out. However, there is a long-standing debate about the origin of the leadership whether it comes naturally or acquired in the passing time. In my opinion, leadership comes naturally as it is a confined personality within the person. In my subsequent paragraph, I will explain my stand.
First of all, a certain instance will trigger the leadership of the person. In that case, they develop self-realization to stand against the conventional unethical pattern of society. In the past, we have seen a similar leadership which is now a great example of leadership. For instance, Nelson Mandela has proved the greatest hero and leader in the African war. Though many Africans had known about how tyrannical was the practice, faced slavery in the African without any revolt. It was the inside motivation of the madela which instigated his protest against the old Britain system in Africa.
Again, the trait, essential for a good leader like vision, shrude nature, persuasive skills, comes naturally rather than learning. Learning these skills may make them familiar with the situation, but unable to handle the situation well as does the natural person. Had these skills acquired by learning, all the decedent of the previous leader would have held their parents' legacy in politics. That's why, a concept of democracy widely followed in the world; otherwise, a kingship will still be prevalent in the world.
In conclusion, a good leader needs to understand the situation and execute their plan as per the situation. However, learned skills may help a bit but would not effective at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... held their parents legacy in politics. Thats why, a concept of democracy widely foll...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 288.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08680555556 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72871382658 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621527777778 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6339288346 48.9658058833 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1764705882 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155107563004 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439484576611 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380741238904 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841988314162 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307962660956 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.