Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
It goes without saying in today's hectic and sophisticated world where we live; human beings have to participate in financial aids and charities to help indulgent people more than the past times. While nowadays some individuals hold the opinion that poor people do not deserve to receive money and food from other people, on the other hand, some believe that aiding to the homeless person is necessary. As far as I am concerned, I assume that it is a responsibility for affluent individuals to help other people, and the reasons to substantiate my point of view are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, due to the advance of technology, many people have lost their jobs. It is crystal clear that a plethora of careers has been disappeared in recent decades. As a result, individuals who lost their occupation they have experienced a lot of financial problems. Since they can not find an alternative job, they need to receive money and food from other people; especially in countries like Iran, which the government does not aid jobless people. An example will bring this notion home. About ten years ago, since the internet had been accessed too easily and conveniently to many people, the taxi companies reduced their employees because a majority of citizens could work based on an online-platform application called Snapp. As a result, a considerable amount of taxi drivers lost their job, and all of these problems came from the genesis of technology.
Moreover, in modern times the reverse of the past century since the economical problems have appeared, many people face a lot of questions. To put it into a more vivid picture, humans have to work for longer times in the day and yet they need aid from the government and other people since the costs of living have been increased in contemporary times. Consequently, workers require different kinds of help like a package of food, vouchers, and also home. In this vein, affluent people must devote a sector of their salary to charities to help the weak part of their society.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons and points into account, I do believe that people are more willing to help poor people. because since the emergence of technology many occupations destroyed and also in contemporary periods people have to pay more for their cost of living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...e reverse of the past century since the economical problems have appeared, many people fac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...e are more willing to help poor people. because since the emergence of technology many ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9641943734 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77307208131 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531969309463 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.946153709 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3125 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239213729487 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794181290206 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496375836966 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157671416715 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028611022787 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.