Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
It is axiomatic that in this sophisticated world where we live, human beings have to be aware of a wide range of scientific fields. Nowadays, due to the expansion of science, many people do not concern some subjects such as history, although mankind's history should not forget from people's eyesight. While some individuals believe that students have to pass the history course, on the other hand, do not see it as a necessary class for learners. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the former idea, and the reasons to support my idea are presented in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that history is one of the essential courses in which students have to take it since history always contains instructive lessons in it. To be more specific, every nation has to understand and analyze the history of their country due to the fact that do not repeat disastrous decisions that had been taken in the past. Consequently, if students get familiar with their ancestor's lives, they will prevent to make harmful decisions. For example, in the past century in my country, since many people were not aware of their history, they trusted England and French troops in order to help them against Russia while a few decades ago Iranian hearted with abuse of Iran's geopolitical situation but again Iranian trusted Britain army. This story occurs again and again because people and the government do not study their history.
Moreover, these days various types of lessons are provided for students in which most of them are boring for teenagers. While subjects like maths and physics involve student's intellectual part of their brain, fields like history could make a good diversity in learner's lessons. To put into a vivid picture, My own example can bring this notion home. When I was a high school student, due to the fact that most of our courses were based on preparation for the university entrance exam, students suffer from the lack of manifold courses. So our deen decided to bring a new teacher who was one of the most famous history teachers in our city. As a result, pupils could concentrate more on their lessons also quenched their thirst for knowledge about history. Finally, we gained a better in the final exams and most of the students believed that this course was one of the most effective factors.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I do believe that holding history courses is beneficial for students. Because students will become aware of the past and they can make decisions better and also it is a different course for learners in which it can provide an diversity in schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...se for learners in which it can provide an diversity in schools.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87665198238 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5524519515 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528634361233 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7996074161 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238380801151 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718518715028 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378590194516 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138594971267 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378925941891 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.