Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well- informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, by developing technology and communications, getting aware of society and world news is being an inevitable part of our life because each event and each accident in each place of the earth has some effects on our life. For example, as our country has a lot of oil resources, the price of this material is very important for us, and this price changes by a short sentence of the United States president's lecture. So, if we want to be a prosperous person in this society, we must be up to date on news and get aware of them from second to second. As many media and government know this matter, They use to affect the news positively or negatively to change them into their favor. For this reason, some people state that it is better to use many news resources to get good information from that. However, some others posit this opinion by saying one resource, specifically resources which are more under the government's control, is enough for them and the government tells us the most truth than others. To me, I definitely with the statement which it is better to get aware of the news from many resources. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that as many media and news resources are under the government's control and their expedients paid by the government, many news is being censored by them because this news is not beneficial for them. For example, by increasing 3 times higher petroleum prices, many people protest through this decision and go to the street to show their wrath about this increase. By the sanction of the government, the police started killing the protest. So, in the national broadcast of our country, the reports showed people something opposite of that and said they are not normal people and they were from foreign enemy countries and wanted to destroy the whole country.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that as there are some limitations in the media, such as few times on TV news or few papers on newspapers, news resources had to exclude some of their news inevitably. Therefore, if we have a unique resource we would not get aware of all news, which most of them are necessary for us. For instance, as our national TV news does not tell anything about the prices, and the prices are just inserted in the daily newspapers my aunt did not get any information about them because he only watches Television. Then he goes out to buy some meat with little money. When he arrived at the butchers' shop and he saw the prices he got confused and got back home.
In conclusion, this is my deep belief that we have to get aware of the news by using numerous resources, while it is not a good issue that we fall in the news and checked all resources every second.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 608, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...a and government know this matter, They use to affect the news positively or negati...
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...heir expedients paid by the government, many news is being censored by them because ...
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...heir expedients paid by the government, many news is being censored by them because this ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60921843687 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52761742437 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492985971944 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0576112301 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.777777778 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7222222222 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211877205605 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746756379729 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718537475559 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128708118429 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498940645884 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.