Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in today’s progressive world where we live, people can access any information easily due to the expanding of broadcasting news. Hopefully, social medi are developed in last decades and can affect on knowledge of each individual. It has a debate among sociologists that utilize the various source of news make the people aware more than past. I hold the view that obtaing the information can make the opportunity to create the well-informes people in society. The reasons to support my idea are illustrated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that media are susceptable to press coverage all the different news. Therefore, people do not have trouble to gain information. Also, each program distribute special topic such as scientific, political news, economical news. Therfore, you face with the majority of news in this way. For instance, my father use to watch documentary show and Europian political news. In this regard, when we are gathering he can describe the whole information update in this era and his friends can rely on his interpretation.
Furthermore, there are a lot of programs in different topics and sometimes TV- producers produce the special programs with opposite side for a particular subject. For example, I had watched the show on TV to explain a reasons of increasing price of meat in Iran. It had two host who examine this content in different ways. Somebody depicted as a change of economical policies and the other one inferred these changes because of political policies. As a result, It was helpful to realize about the idea with broad expanding knowledge.
In conclusion, having considered a above-mantioned reasons into account, I believe that getting information from a wide range of sources can influence directly on critical thinking of people. Consequently, they would be update and be wisdom person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...i are developed in last decades and can affect on knowledge of each individual. It has a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ws in this way. For instance, my father use to watch documentary show and Europian ...
^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a reason' or simply 'reasons'?
Suggestion: a reason; reasons
...I had watched the show on TV to explain a reasons of increasing price of meat in Iran. It...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'host' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hosts'.
Suggestion: hosts
...asing price of meat in Iran. It had two host who examine this content in different w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... ways. Somebody depicted as a change of economical policies and the other one inferred the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...edge. In conclusion, having considered a above-mantioned reasons into account, I...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14838709677 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97806060267 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622580645161 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1957272512 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22631319616 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617732184391 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422429077015 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125180667388 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401127798185 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.