Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Making decisions plays a pivotal role in young people's lifetime, which may influence far-reaching in their future. It has triggered the debated issue as to whether young people nowadays have more chance to make decisions by their themselves. My view is that today young people relative possibly make decisions than people in the past decades. More reasons and examples might be shed light on as follows.
First and foremost, nowadays young people are able to acquire innumerable information in the short time, and it can beneficial for them to make decision. Thanks to the ever-changing advance of technology and science, the Internet provides young people a convenient way to search for plenty of information which they do the choices depended on. Take my experience as an example, when I chose what professional department in the college, I can easily search the Internet to find the website of each department's introduction and recommendations from other people. Thus, I can confidently determine the department and do not regret my decision.
In addition, Young people have got more freedom from their parents and society, which induce them to pursue their decision. It is because that no one will interfere with young people's decisions anymore, which is rare to see in the past decades. Parents recently encourage their children to think more and be responsible for their own choice, which helps them learn more experience. However, young people in the past frequently were forced to listen to their parents' opinions, and the atmosphere of the whole society insisted to comply with parents' suggestions because they considered that it was more respectful. Young people at that time could only give up their genuine decisions to sustain the relationship with their parents. Hence, young people nowadays are easier to make decisions by themselves.
Last but not least, money is an essential role in making own decisions, and young people in the past had less money. Long-term poverty is a serious predicament for people who expect to do whatever they want, but young people usually have no possession to achieve decisions they make even they were in the past. Young people in the past had to grapple and wrestle with the adversity of poverty so that they did not have attention to achieve their goals and usually yield to the suggestion from their parents. For instance, my uncle expected to study abroad for his bachelor's degree, but my grandfather had no money to afford his school's tuition. Hence, he chose to study in a normal university that does not need tuition and has an extra allowance.
In conclusion, young people in the past decades had to make decisions by their parents' suggestions, while nowadays are able to determine by themselves. Information searching, freedom from society and parents and money have influence deeply to whether young people can make decisions by their own.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...decisions plays a pivotal role in young peoples lifetime, which may influence far-reach...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ure. It has triggered the debated issue as to whether young people nowadays have more chance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'departments'' or 'department's'?
Suggestion: departments'; department's
...he Internet to find the website of each departments introduction and recommendations from o...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2426.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10736842105 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72033564818 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463157894737 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1673130461 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.523809524 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.619047619 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478537479943 0.236089414692 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172757167551 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974123594091 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310177557348 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994933083278 0.0645574589148 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.