Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past.
In the modern era with the myriad complexities, protecting the environment and the Earth are highly important and vital; therefore, people and government should pay attention to environmental issues. To this aim, a controversial question is that whether nowadays' people can preserve nature better than the past ones or not. Personally, it is my firm conviction that today's life is more complex than the before; so, protecting the environment is significantly more sophisticated. To explain my idea elaborately, I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first worthwhile reason is that although technology made better welfare for society, the level of complexities is increased in comparison with the past. Complexities, such as cars, buses, factories, and so on that are responsible for air pollution, do not let today's humans effectively protect the environment. This fact is related to another fact which claims humans to find enough food and facilities need to enhance factories in order to produce sufficient amount of food and essential materials. Therefore, stopping the works of factories and activities that are dangerous for the environment but are beneficial for human life is not possible at all because the current growing population of human beings needs more and more resources for keeping them alive.
The second factor that should be considered is that although modern society has access to more valuable resources that make them aware of natural problems, nowadays' people are more selfish and careless. Actually, peoples do not completely feel nature's problems after civilization, improvement of dwelling, and the advent of the internet. Nevertheless, previous people felt more close relation with nature. For example, my grandmother told me that her family had an amazing vibe about mountains, grasses, and flowers in such a way that they considered nature as a member of their family. Conversely, in the current century, adults are struggling to achieve money to pass life's difficulties and nature is not their priority. Similarly, today’s children are spending their time in virtual life and social networks such as Instagram, Facebook, and so forth. In other words, although they are aware of the severe environmental issues, they are grown lazy and careless; so, they are not mentally and physically ready to preserve the Earth.
To sum up, although some people believe that current's society can save the Earth more effectively than the past one, I think it is not true due to the fact that today's not only have we more complicated issues, but also technology and current lifestyle are created the more lazy people, who are not accustomed to hard work especially hard working for saving things that benefit them indirectly, they can not see immediate benefits from saving the environment. Honestly, I hope mother nature be kinder than us with us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-23 | wxr031 | 52 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | Greenbluemind | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-04 | OlliverYang | 70 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | Reza3068 | 90 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | mehmoh | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One can learn about another person from the books and movies that the person likes 73
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 76
- Integrated Tpo 65 Tuna Fish Farming Reading passage Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for 60
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ersonally it is my firm conviction that todays life is more complex than the before so...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 756, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd more resources for keeping them alive The second factor that should be conside...
^^^
Line 3, column 1009, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d physically ready to preserve the Earth To sum up although some people believe t...
^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'currents'' or 'current's'?
Suggestion: currents'; current's
...um up although some people believe that currents society can save the Earth more effecti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, first, honestly, if, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2376.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1652173913 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78737363765 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519565217391 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 460.0 20.1344086022 2285% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2376.0 100.406767564 2366% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 460.0 20.6045352989 2233% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 171.0 5.45110844103 3137% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211460157554 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211460157554 0.076458572812 277% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13727816045 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579088478804 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 232.9 11.7677419355 1979% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -403.88 58.1214874552 -695% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 183.9 10.1575268817 1810% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 30.3 8.01818996416 378% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 10.002688172 610% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 186.0 10.0537634409 1850% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 10.247311828 595% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.