Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, we are in a situation in which the world is changing and becoming more complicated than before. As a result of this progression, the management of many living life issues such as monetary-relating hurdles and educational purposes is not as possible as before. Therefore, a more complex and powerful tool is needed for handling these emerging gaps. I believe that the provision of free access to the Internet is a prudent course of action and would be beneficial. I have the idea mentioned above for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the Internet is a crucial factor that plays a significant role in many aspects of our life and numerous businesses rely on the desirable and constant performance of this tool. In this regard, reliable and permanent access to the Internet without any disruption would be valuable and useful in social satisfaction. My personal experience demonstrates the effectiveness of this decision by the government. Four years ago, when I was a freshman at the university, I had a financial problem, and I ran out of money in my bank account. Thus I had to call my parents and ask them to help me with the payments that I had. Due to the availability of online transactions, my father could send me some money. If the online system for conveying money were not accessible, I would not be able to pay my tuition and living costs. This experience proved that how internet accessibility can be influential in social satisfaction.
Secondly, Online services and internet utilization are not financially affordable for all of the people, however, in these modern days, everybody needs to benefit from this broad platform. Internet costs a fortune in some countries, and not everyone can provide this money, on the other hand, the rapid pace of growth has brought about an inevitable demand for this relatively new tool. For example, the recent pandemic event, COVID19, that engrossed the whole world, caused the emergence of a challenging financial issue. On-campus classes were canceled, and online courses were replaced instead. Therefore, students had to attend classes via the Internet and, for this reason, they should purchase internet services which were not cheap. In conjunction with the affordability concern, the government could increase the income tax to compensate budget deficiency that is created because of the recent decision. In this way a more fair use of the Internet is possible.
In conclusion, providing cost-free internet access is a thoughtful idea. It could have prosperous consequences such as social satisfaction and well being, and equal utilization for all of the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... I ran out of money in my bank account. Thus I had to call my parents and ask them t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tion are not financially affordable for all of the people, however, in these modern days, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...air use of the Internet is possible. In conclusion, providing cost-free interne...
^^
Line 6, column 182, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d well being, and equal utilization for all of the people.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12585812357 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99227413984 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558352402746 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2393921138 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186757825314 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553741402832 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585823520406 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120383897032 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408606339176 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.