Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days, most of the businesses are based on teamwork and overall success of a group often depends on whether or not its members can cooperate effectively. Personally, I think that in order to succeed at a workplace, employees have to be capable of getting along with co-workers rather than studying hard in school. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To start with, deep knowledge can be obtained only through personal experience. If a person is able to communicate well with his seasoned colleagues, he can learn from them about details of his job. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. After graduation from a pharmacy school, I thought that I knew a lot about my profession since I was a brilliant student. However, when I first started working in a pharmacy, I found out that I had no idea about how to resolve numerous problems with insurance companies, which was a crucial part of my job. Fortunately, my ability to relate well to people helped me to establish great relationships with more experienced co-workers and learn from them how to process claims to insurance companies in detail. If I had not had the ability to socialize easily, I would not have become a great professional.
Secondly, the ability to get along with colleagues can help to maintain a positive environment in a workplace and achieve wonderful outcomes. For example, a job of a pharmacist can be truly stressful because pharmacies are often very busy, especially during a winter season when citizens have a cold and flu. In this way, customers can be angry and aggressive. At such moments supportive from associates can help to overcome stress and keep working. That is why I often make jokes and tell funny stories to my pharmacy technicians, so they can mentally relax and continue doing their job. As a result, all of my teammates are always in a positive mood and our pharmacy is one of the best in a company.
To conclude, I strongly believe that it is more important for people to be able to interact with others weel rather that study intensively in school. This is because it can help them to grow professionally and overcome stress at a workplace.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to work in a large company than in a small one. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use that there are now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHETHER
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
...all success of a group often depends on whether or not its members can cooperate effectively. ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i feel, i think, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77806788512 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87531029297 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566579634465 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0399941854 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181504172923 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516449865666 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487749821439 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113143462737 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029816891939 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.