Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard at school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard at school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It goes without saying that in today's progressive and complex world where we live, should people improve their skills like socialize person, they will reach their goals and success in future occupation. while most of people opinion that study hard in school is important for success in future career. But other people strongly assume that social interaction is extremely important to be successful lifestyle. I personally speaking believe that social interaction and communication is a key of success. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are the elaborated upon in my following paragraph.

To begin with, it is crystal clear that the successful people who, have ability to the social interaction, are important clever. In fact, emotional intelligent(EQ) as important as intelligent quotient(IQ). Indeed, The successful people not only socialize person but also great talkative person. For example, for five years, I have been working in graphic design company and communication with a lot of customers. Also, I was graduated of prestigious university with high level of degree but My experience is that, if designers would be communicate with consumers, they will comfortable and easily to work. In the other world, communication play pivotal role in successful people lives. Thus, improve emotional (EQ) is great opportunity to be lead to successful professional works.

Furthermore, without doubt, the successful people who, have ability to the social interaction. They gain a lot of practical experience which cannot teach in school. In the other hand, success full people listen to stories of customers very well. Also, they use psychological strategy of practical communication with customers. Not only the social person is experienced, but also Professional in their occupation.

In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons into account, I firmly believe that social interaction most specific communication with customers is beneficial to boost job. Moreover, the successful career person have high level of emotional intelligent.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...goals and success in future occupation. while most of people opinion that study hard ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...and success in future occupation. while most of people opinion that study hard in school is im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65806451613 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13346709333 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9569019898 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3157894737 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219639247889 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745699638336 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599627563132 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139192362815 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359604024291 0.0645574589148 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.