Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It stands to reason that education is one of essential needs in every person's life, so teachers have a great role in this issue. In this regard, some contention arises as to how value of teachers have been changed by society over time. One common view is that teachers were more valueable and noticeable by their community in the past. I concur with it because not only they had a great cultural effect but also earned more money in the past.
The first point which deserves some words here is that teachers have had surprigingly the more great effect in the cultural issue of a country, the more appreciated by society. In the past, communities encounted with a wide array of problems, especially cultural issues such as illiteracy. Many people did not have enough information and knowledge about different things, so governments decided to utilize teachers to resolve these peopblems and enhance the level and class of their culture. As an example, consider a far away village, which most of the residents were illiterate. It caused some other issues like not knowing to behave each other correctly or work together, so their governments determined to employ a teacher for that village to improve people's knowledge and learn them a slot of required things. After a while, it led to a great accomplishment in that area which spreaded to other parts of their country.
The second point that should be mentioned here is that teachers are unique persons in their work in the past, so they have been respectful people in their society. In the past, there was a few professional and expert people like teachers in a community, so not only did they earn money more but also became more valued. Governments and people assign more budget for respectful professional teachers. As an illustration, when a small city needed a professional person in reading newspapers in the past, they referred to teachers, so teachers could obtain much money in this way. On the other hand, because of their knowledge, people have honered and valued them a lot.
In conclusion, teachers are more valueable and regarded by sociey in the past because not only did they were especial people but also had a great cultural impact in their community. It is highly recommended that educational systems consider useful policies to fund teachers to become more trained to help in solving social issues in a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tion is one of essential needs in every persons life, so teachers have a great role in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92326732673 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66253230528 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490099009901 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9671944392 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187182984839 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700214908465 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420504908953 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135816397639 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390521792538 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.