Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays parents pay more attention to the improvement of their children's knowledge. It is significant to notice this fact that teachers play a crucial role in this regard in every era. But maybe teachers' level of value in today's society has been questioned. Personally, I believe that teachers were more valued by society in the past. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I will explain in the following essay.

First of all, different knowledge and information are more accessible for students than in the past. In fact, improvements in technologies, like the internet and smartphones, can cause students to solve their questions every time and anywhere. According to this issue, students may feel to not needing teachers as much as past because they access to a fast and easily achievable source. Subsequently, it seems that teachers are not valued more by society as in the past. For example, my sister had to do an experiment which was in their science book and prepare a report about it. But she had some technical problems, and she could not access her teacher, so she decided to search on youtube. Besides, she could not only solve her problem but also understand the concept of the experiment efficiently.

Secondly, teachers' methods are old and inefficient which can cause to reduce their value in society. It is worth illustrating that new teachers are using old ways to teach students as teachers used in the past. As today students need variety in teaching more than in past, so teachers have to use interesting methods which can persuade students to try more to improve their knowledge. In addition, sciences are progressing in the world and there are lots of facilities to access these new sciences, so society can expect teachers to improve their methods which can pave the way for students to improve their information. For example, the way that my teacher uses to teach me mathematics is the same way as my mother's teacher used in the past.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that teachers are not more appreciated and valued by society than they were in the past. I think this way because facilities, like the internet, can make it easy to access knowledge for students, and teachers' methods are old which are not interesting to students.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...are old and inefficient which can cause to reduce their value in society It is worth illu...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80829015544 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6221149079 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430051813472 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 386.0 20.1344086022 1917% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1856.0 100.406767564 1848% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 386.0 20.6045352989 1873% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 144.0 5.45110844103 2642% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26090329244 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.26090329244 0.076458572812 341% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185872691828 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315416355901 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 194.2 11.7677419355 1650% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -311.85 58.1214874552 -537% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 152.7 10.1575268817 1503% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.1 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.28 8.01818996416 315% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 10.002688172 580% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 156.4 10.0537634409 1556% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.247311828 566% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.