Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teacher plays an important role in every individual's life, since they educate students about academic knowledge, the way they get along with others, and the attitude they face problems. Some people may argue that teachers gain more respect from societies in recent years, I firmly believe that teachers are more valued by people in the past than now. I consider this way based on several reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, most parents protect their children more nowadays, thereby viewing teachers as more insignificant compared with their children. That is to say, today when conflicts occur between kids and teachers, parents tend to stand by their children without sufficient consideration about which side makes more sense. Moreover, nowadays many parents do not want their kids to be punished and blamed at school by teachers. For instance, my grandparents told me that if they performed terribly or got a fight with other classmates at school, they will be hit and punished by teachers at school. Furthermore, if their parents got this kind of news from the teachers, the parents would apologize to the teachers sincerely, and blamed the kids strictly. In contrast, one of my classmates engaged in a fight with others in the class in high school; however, after my classmate's mother was informed about this, she came to the school and blamed the teacher furiously. She argued that the teacher did not maintain the peaceful atmosphere in class, and protect her kid from the fight.
Secondly, teaching was a high-level job among others decades ago, but now, it does not gain such a high reputation as before. To be specific, in the past, parents always expected their children to grow up to be teachers, doctors, or engineers, since these jobs ensure high salaries and stabilities. Therefore, these occupations were highly appreciated and respected by society at that time. Nonetheless, due to a diversity of industry development, more and more various occupations occur, and each job gradually become equivalently viewed by people. Consequently, teachers were no longer valued as much as they were several decades ago.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that teachers were more valued in the past than they are in recent years. This is because parents are much more protective toward their children nowadays, therefore teachers are not valued that much in comparison. In addition, the status of teachers among all occupations is not as high as it was decades ago.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...eacher plays an important role in every individuals life, since they educate students about...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in contrast, kind of, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7012178595 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532687651332 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8517634468 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.45110844103 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233351225903 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805985656314 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653452640308 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161519715549 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490784667064 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.