The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Whereas some people like to stay close to a small group of friends for a long time, others prefer to keep making new friends. Both of these require a certain effort and ability to achieve. My personal experiences have led me to conclude that maintaining relations with a few friends for a long period of time brings me more satisfaction. I consider this way for several reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, even though I get the ability to make new friends effortlessly, it is always exhausting to get to know new ones. To leave new friends a good impression on social occasions, people need to spend time and money buying new clothes and dressing up. Moreover, when talking about our own stories, we need to be careful to decide what to say, since this influences how new people are going to judge us. However, if attending the gathering with a small group of good old friends, we do not need to worry about how these friends are going to view us. Therefore, we can just dress up casually and be ourselves. It is more relaxing getting along with a few friends who we have known each other for a long time.
Secondly, a small group of close friends are more likely to provide emotional support. Nowadays, people are always overwhelmed by busy and overloaded lives. This kind of lifestyle has caused enormous pressure and trouble on humans which makes us frustrated. At this time, I would seek friends to pour out my heart and ask for advice. In this way, I could not only release my stress but also obtain some suggestions to tackle the problem I have faced in my life. Since close friends know me better, they can provide me with advice according to my personality and past experience. For instance, I broke up with my ex-boyfriend last year, which made me feel extremely depressed. At that time, my best group of friends from high school stayed with me the majority of the time, and since they knew that relationship well, they provided me with useful advice to help me get through the hard time. If it were not them, a group of ten years friends, I couldn't recover that fast.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that the ability to maintain long friendships with a small number of people makes me feel happier. It is because making new friends takes a great deal of effort and price. Also, close friends bring more emotional support which is necessary in today's world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...relations with a few friends for a long period of time brings me more satisfaction. I consider...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...be careful to decide what to say, since this influences how new people are going to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...know me better, they can provide me with advice according to my personality and p...
^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... advice according to my personality and past experience. For instance, I broke up with my ex-bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 947, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...t them, a group of ten years friends, I couldnt recover that fast. To sum up, I am o...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ility to maintain long friendships with a small number of people makes me feel happier. It is bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, kind of, talking about, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58796296296 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49092574695 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530092592593 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3482922172 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0909090909 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307846039507 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914326564074 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725151660915 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226651661445 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726648764362 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.