Do you agree or disagree with this following statement?
“Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.”
Technology is a product of several creativities, and today, all perspectives of human life have flourished by technology. Besides, the new generation is exposed to an altered living state. I believe this fantastic innovation provides an environment for children to experience, discover, and grow appropriately. Today, many applications and devices are available to reinforce children’s adventure sensation.
Firstly, in many cases, every innovation reveals many ways that eventually lead to the subsequent creativities, and technology isn’t an exception. Indeed, children who were using old designs in the past improved the main foundation of contemporary technology. To be more specific, newborn babies raised in a new environment seek unknowns in the modern world that caused increasing creativity grounds. Fortunately, technology extraordinarily changes the world, which provides a desirable environment for creating fresh ideas. Its significant advance can make children more creative than in the past. For example, animations enable a child to inspire from strange aspects of human life and, finally, start to imagine unusual life and make she/he a creator.
Secondly, technology acts like a creativity school that helps children learn diverse skills and facilitates the learning process. Today, many applications are developed just for a child’s learning issues, and Many of them simulate objects and enhance the child’s perception. Also, some devices are designed by psychologists that are familiar with babies mind growing exercises. Although these tools, like smartphones, have physical drawbacks when using them excessively, limited use of them can be beneficial. Anyway, the condition is more favorable to form creative children compared to the past.
To sum up, technology has penetrated most aspects of human life and has many advantages. In this case, technology revives the exploration sprite in children by its potential capability. As excessive use mostly has deleterious, limited usage of technology can grows children mentally. So parents must control their children’s usage of technology rather than preventing using them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unusual life and make she/he a creator. Secondly, technology acts like a creativ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'grow'
Suggestion: grow
...erious, limited usage of technology can grows children mentally. So parents must cont...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, besides, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86984126984 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13980932865 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1589957918 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3157894737 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19146849685 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628107338401 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530380796714 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117299446553 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03148514083 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 58.1214874552 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 10.9000537634 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.