Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Living and working in a constantly changing world, it is widely acknowledged that efficiency is life and we need to squeeze time in any occasion possible. In this token, some people argues that it is more wisely to finish tasks in a short time with the risk of mistakes than to sacrifice time for correctness. This opinion, makes sense to some extent though, is agreed upon by me. In the following paragraphs I will elaborate my reasons for holding so in detail.
First and foremost, the quality of an assignment is much more vital than the speed it is done. The boss is expecting a perfect performance rather than a hasty one since the latter is a waste of his time to even look at. If an individual hand in a commercial contract awash with flaws, even if it it finished within half day, the leader will not be satisfied. The result is highly likely that this very employee start the whole task once again to correct the mistakes, which virtually wastes longer hours or even days. However, if the man change the way of his thinking and check every detail carefully from the very beginning, it will not end up with such a mess.
Another reason we should not prefer the so-called efficiency over correctness is that once a mistake occurs, the person who makes it will be considered as reckless ever since, which will definitely exert negative impact on his career path. Take the employee from the last paragraph again as an instance. It is basically not probable that his boss will allocate important work to him since his carelessness and rusty has entrenched in the boss's mind. From this we can see that trade faults for time might cost a worker's vocation promotion. Nevertheless, carrying out your task with due scrutiny might win the applause from your leader and facilitate your development.
While I understand that sometimes to scrutinize your work with due carefulness might be time-consuming and cause work overtime, which is a burden to employees. If people consciously cultivate themselves the habit of being careful, this problem will be completely solved at last.
To put it in a nutshell, the real situation necessitates workers to thoroughly weight the pros and cons before jumping to the arrangement of time. As discussed above, I can safely come to the conclusion that working slower to make sure there is no mistake is more favorable because eventually it is the most effective way and will save people from undue troubles as well as assist them to prospect .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...cial contract awash with flaws, even if it it finished within half day, the leader wi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...that trade faults for time might cost a workers vocation promotion. Nevertheless, carry...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ubles as well as assist them to prospect .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79439252336 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67911783363 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.055681389 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184195076665 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051994297159 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421536970851 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10310317648 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357128354855 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.