Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays science technology has advanced so much. In every specialized field of science, people put an emphasis on the strength of evidence when they accept new findings. In order to give out strong evidences, we should strive for accuracy and should reflect on the quality of what we do in each stage before moving on to the next step.

By taking enough time to elaborate experiment plans, we can get strong evidences from experiments. For example, three years ago I made a clinical research. I was curious about what kind of results the abuse of antibiotics which have broad spectrums. I take a lot of hours to examine the data of questionnaires answered by many hospitals. Then I realized an additional fact that developing countries are more likely to use antibiotics of broad spectrum without considering the situation much. I could get more information than I planned at first by taking time. This new finding rather attracted the attention from researchers from all over the world. By taking time examining what we do, we can sometimes get unpredictable profits.

Also, this is not only applied to today’s world, but would be common to every age. Efficiency doesn’t coincide with how fast we can finish tasks. If we make a mistake in the early stage of the task, we sometimes have to return to the first stage and start all again. For example, this is a case which I experienced five years ago. Again I was conducting a clinical research. The deadline of submitting my paper was coming close, so I was rushing to get the results. Because I was in a hurry, I was careless enough to make a basic mistake. I forgot to take confounding factors into consideration. Experiments can’t provide strong evidences when researchers don’t eliminate confounding factors. So I ended up spoiling the experiment. We can make a basic mistake when we struggle to meet a deadline. We should always take enough time to complete the task with the greatest performance.

As you can see in the previous paragraphs, working quickly doesn’t always bring about better results. Sometimes mistakes on the way can be fatal, so we should always take enough time to prevent mistakes and to review what we are doing. Then the consequence will be much better.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'clinical research'.
Suggestion: clinical research
...ts. For example, three years ago I made a clinical research. I was curious about what kind of resul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'clinical research'.
Suggestion: clinical research
... five years ago. Again I was conducting a clinical research. The deadline of submitting my paper wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93979057592 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88769561127 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5500297676 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5769230769 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.45110844103 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11217941059 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296044061664 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333266363016 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654919361776 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357951616901 0.0645574589148 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.