Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
During the past till this new modern era, transportation has been one of the main part of the human-being life. In the past, people used to move with animals, such as horses. But, this issue has thoroughly changed by invention of steam engine. After this event, the vehicles for moving people have improved more rapidly, and in the latest century, the usage of modern cars has occurred a serious evolution in the people's life. But recently, the experts state that using this type of vehicle must be restricted and people have to use public transportation instead. However, some others believe that this matter would not be done because the demand for cars is growing fast, and nobody can prevent this issue. This matter has become controversial in these days. In my view, increasing the demand for cars is inevitable and this issue will increase the number of cars. In this article, I will delve into my two main points.
The first reason, which I want to address is about money and profits. Producing new cars has more benefits than extending public transportation infrastructures. While the governments have to pay subsidies for those infrastructures, they earn lots of taxes from car producing factories and car owners. Also, the governments have considerable income from selling fuel. The sum of these reasons provide us a reasonable reason for producing more cars instead of making public transportation vehicles, such as bus and train, and constructing suitable infrastructures for them. Additionally, car producing industries need a lot of workers, and they can decrease the unemployment rate seriously. For instance, in the United States, more than 10 percent of American people work in the car producing factories, such as General Motors or Ford. And these two factories have solved a considerable part of unemployment problem in this country merely.
Secondly, I think by the time passes, people seek for welfare more than before. One of the items, which provides more relief for people, at least they think that does, is having a private car. Most people imply that they can live easier when they own a car than they move with trains or busses. Most of the time this issue is true, even in the prosperous countries. Also, people state that although airplane is easier vehicle than car and transporting with that is faster, it has many problems. For example, some people fear of flight and state that it has the risk of downfall. Also, this vehicle is too expensive and people have to spend a lot of money for just a ticket. Another reason is the restricted capability of moving by airplane. The airplane can only move between long distances, it is not possible for it to move between two points of a city.
In conclusion, although the increase in the car population has many dangers and threatens the environment, this issue is inevitable due to the preference of people to using them and the huge profits both for the governments and investors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...has occurred a serious evolution in the peoples life. But recently, the experts state t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2470.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95983935743 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76295005415 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489959839357 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0951744641 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4814814815 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18518518519 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127186836371 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399246215103 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365562312659 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831364485353 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167902829844 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.