Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Transportation, the foundation of each individual's life, triggers heated discussions over whether the number of cars will increase in twenty years. The number of cars on the roads, in some people's view, will continuously boost. On the contrary, my perspective is that there will be fewer cars in use than today for the following reasons.
To begin with, people's awareness of environmental protection will contribute to the less frequent use of private cars in the future. First, as the problem regarding the environment becomes alerting recently, citizens start to realize the importance of environmental preservation. With the publicizing of different environmental issues, citizens nowadays gradually know that assorted contamination, such as air pollution, will cause detrimental effects on the earth. As a result, they may tend to try their best to lower the damage to the environment. Since cars emit exhaust fumes which will do harm to both people's health and air atmosphere, people will try to take public transportations instead of driving private cars. Therefore, the number of cars on the road will decline. Simultaneously, the government will also attach significance to air pollution because it is the governors' obligation to prevent the deterioration of the environment. In detail, the authority may enact some regulations or laws to motivate residents to take buses or subway, such as exerting taxes when buying cars or providing discounts when taking buses. Consequently, there will be definitely fewer cars on the road in the future.
In addition to people's awareness of environmental issues, never should we ignore that it is not necessary for most people to buy cars with the development of technology. First, with the advent of the internet, one can accomplish a lot of tasks at home conveniently. For instance, after selecting items they want on the online store, people just need to pay the money online and wait for the package at home. Therefore, dwellers will find out that it is effortless to live in a city without private cars. Besides, even if people still need to go somewhere by car, they can also choose an alternative way. With the development of self-driving cars, there will be more and more intelligent taxis on the road. For example, Google has been researching for years to let cars drive autonomously and achieved astonishing success. Therefore, I believe that in the future, people are able to call a robot taxi at any time they want, even if at midnight. So private cars will not be indispensable in the future, and fewer vehicles are required in twenty years.
In conclusion, there will be fewer automobiles in the future compared with today due to people's awareness of protecting the earth and the development of technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
Transportation, the foundation of each individuals life, triggers heated discussions over ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 876, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governors'' or 'governor's'?
Suggestion: governors'; governor's
...ance to air pollution because it is the governors obligation to prevent the deterioration...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18666666667 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06046393643 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531111111111 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4718627222 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.090909091 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228862960833 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770145288551 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793506379347 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165132504918 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555020440872 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.