Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recently there has been a ton of debate about whether there will be an increase in the number of vehicles in the next twenty years. Although some people believe that demand for cars in the near future will drop significantly, I believe that the line curve of this figure with respect to time will continue to rise up. I firmly believe this way owing to several reasons, and I will elaborate on this idea in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, one of the driving factors behind this is increased population over time. As the population increases, the more no of people will start availing public transport. The increase in the demand of public transports will lead to an increase in the number of vehicles, like bus, auto, train etc. Moreover, this will increase traffic congestion, and hence, more time will be wasted waiting on the traffic. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. You see, while working in my first company in 2016, I used to travel via train for around 2 hours to commute to the office . I used to get frustrated as I used to spend this entire time doing no productive work. Moreover, I got so stressed after reaching the office that I couldn't even concentrate on my work. As a result, I had to buy my own car. For this reason, I believe that along with the increase in the number of public vehicles, there will be a high demand for private cars as well.
Secondly, another important factor is that due to increased economic pressure automobile companies are setting less price of the cars to attract more customers. Due to the less expensive car, middle class people can afford their own private car. Moreover, having a private car is a 'status symbol' in current society. Drawing from my own experience, after completing my graduation, when I joined industry, I was searching for flats near my office. However, with only 6 lpa salary, I could only afford a car as Hyundai company was offering discounts on the first purchase. It is certainly clear that If I had never made this decision, I would never utilize my time properly by cutting down the time wasted on traffic.
In the light of the above mentioned points, I strongly believe that there will be high demand for cars in the twenty years. This is because of increased population and improvement in the automobile industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e this way owing to several reasons, and I will elaborate on this idea in the sub...
^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
.... As the population increases, the more no of people will start availing public tr...
^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... around 2 hours to commute to the office . I used to get frustrated as I used to s...
^^
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ressed after reaching the office that I couldnt even concentrate on my work. As a resul...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1001, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a high demand for private cars as well. Secondly, another important factor is th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utting down the time wasted on traffic. In the light of the above mentioned poin...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mprovement in the automobile industry.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as a result, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.663507109 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58552116927 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502369668246 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7919434098 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7142857143 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155637686047 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483134673795 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448390629054 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100799000151 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329571153925 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.