Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
It goes without saying that communicating with people plays a crucial role in every individual's life, and today people can communicate, whether online or in person. In this regard, some people believe that working on a shared project with colleagues or classmates in person is more beneficial than sending emails. In my opinion, I firmly stand for the view that communicating face-to-face is more suitable. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, talking face-to-face lets people express their emotions which is impossible to show in an email. Therefore people can understand the meaning of people's words correctly and will not misinterpret them. In fact, the facial expression is an appropriate way to send our messages. For example, when I was a student, I used to get in touch with students who might think their classmates were aggressive while reading their email; however, the letter had not been written by an angry student. When people express their feelings, they can establish an emotional bond and become friends. In fact, communicating with different people can provide a lot of benefits. For example, I have received many job offers from the people with who I have communicated.
Second, people can enhance their social skills by communicating with their colleagues or classmates because they can express their ideas and discuss a particular subject with other people. Moreover, people can see others' perspectives and opinions, which can bond with each other. For example, when I was a student at school, I had to give a presentation with my friends, and we had many disagreements. We could finally decide on the topic for our projects by discussing and expressing our ideas. All of us learned how to discuss and convince others.
In conclusion, although some people like to communicate with people by sending emails, I would prefer to make a communication in person. Not only do people not have misinterpretations, but also they increase their social skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...th people plays a crucial role in every individuals life, and today people can communicate,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hich is impossible to show in an email. Therefore people can understand the meaning of pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14545454545 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97365845855 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8887379224 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200508606622 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668685394881 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486635834673 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13987643885 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469439585199 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.