Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When doing research, it is better to use printed materials such as books and articles than it is to use the Internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that using Internet over books and articles for research has both positive and negative effects. If I had to choose one, I would definitely choose Internet over books and articles. therefore, I disagree with the following statement. I firmly believe that Internet is better than books and articles for several reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, Today, With the advent of internet we can have access to plethora of information. Internet has made the process of searching the information quite simple and efficient for the researchers. Today, researchers don’t have to skim through hundreds of pages to get the required information. Instead, they can get access to the information in just few clicks, which can save them an ample amount of time. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. Recently, I was writing a research paper in the AI domain but could not find certain information in the book I was referring; however, with the help of internet I could easily view previous work done in the AI domain, which helped me complete my research paper on time. If internet would have not been there, I would have surely missed my deadline.
Secondly, Research is not all about gathering information, but it is also about communicating with other researchers in the same field. With the help of internet it’s easier to communicate with other researcher globally. Researchers can use Internet as a tool to collaborate on a research topic, which will give them a broader outlook of that particuler topic. For Instance, several virtual IEEE conferences are organized aroud the world to provide opportunities for the researchers to interconnect with each other. These virtual conferences prevent researchers from the cumbersome task of travelling to multiple locations.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that Internet is a much better tool for research than books and articles. This is because the internet is much more efficient than books and article, and it helps the researchers to connect with other researchers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...hoose Internet over books and articles. therefore, I disagree with the following statemen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the world to provide opportunities for the researchers to interconnect with eac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14245014245 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90293399075 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51566951567 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.662002244 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.277777778 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223984040753 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802249773902 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607594787713 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158016511575 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627449981139 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.