Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The history of every nation plays a vital role in forming its culture. However, by widespread modernization, people do not pay attention to their country's history that much. I believe that it should not be compulsory for pupils to attend history classes. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
To begin with, I think that history classes are too boring for students to engage in them. Pupils should attend the courses that they are interested in them because when you do not like a class, you definitely will not learn anything. In other words, students should be able to decide to go to classes that they want, and the courses should be related to their major in the university. If they like other subjects, such as history, they can read books that are based on these subjects. For instance, I remember when I was at university, the university made all of us attend classes based on the history of my country or geographic ones. Their marks calculated in our final grades. It was exhausting for all of us to participate in those classes, so we did not learn anything about them because we just wanted to escape from them. As a result, none of my classmates got good grades in those classes, and all of them were agree about how boring they were.
Secondly, while you choose a field of study, it is unnecessary to attend classes in which they do not have any conjunction with your major. That is, students should devote their time to study their main lessons because in the universities they are so busy, and these lessons such as history is time-consuming. Although history lessons give us information about our country, they cannot prepare us for our future job opportunities, so they are a waste of time. For example, when I was in my junior year at university, I had to take two exams in one day which one of them was about a historical revolution, and the other one was math, which I needed to pass it to be able to attend chemistry in next term. I could not study math as much as I should have. Therefore, I could not pass the exam, and this made me behind my schedule of graduating.
To put it in a nutshell, I believe students should be able to decide which classes they want to take in the university because these general classes, such as history, are not enjoyable for all pupils, and they do not play a significant role in student's future job availabilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 921, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... in those classes, and all of them were agree about how boring they were. Second...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57798165138 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62591742118 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461009174312 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.84186988 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.052631579 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9473684211 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229492191434 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757671505922 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504763953639 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147444629121 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193129200074 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.