Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Truth, symbol of honesty, is one of the vital necessities in our life. This world lies in the trust between the people. And, without trust, any work cannot be possible between to groups or people. Habit and character of disguise around everywhere is the epitome of unstability in this 21st century. Personally, I believe that truth is one of the momentous consideration required for the sustainable relationship between the two parties. I feel this for the two reasons, which I explore in the following essays.

To begin with, any types of friendship will exists then, whenever there a truth and trustees will alive. Wherever, there is absence of truth, it is all like a fragility--either it may be between the friends circle or in a parents. Truth is a kind of bond between two parties. My own experience is a compelling reason for this. When I was at school and universities, although I have many friends, however, I have only one true friends. I regularly used to share my experience and activities with him; and it occurs a vice-versa within us. We share our internal family matters, and other different matters. If someone, heard these types of things--in a little bit of sense, others used to ridicule. Other friend have an attitude of competition, they lie and always have a sense of disguise, keeping always behind from them. However, the friend like true friend always share the truth, and these types of friends remains forever in our life. Today, also the friend who is regularly telling the truth remains as true friend while, others became a part at the some extent of life and breakthrough after some while. Thus, by telling the truth will always innocuous and always get support in the life, especially in the case of a hardship.

Secondly, any group, project and organization will withstand to the period of time when there is maintainance of truth. Unless, these truth doesn't remains, these groups and parties will soon disintegrate. For instance, any political party will soon fractured due to the hide of reality among the members of the same group. Many political parties and groups were disintegrated due to the lack of honesty/truth. The major political parties of Nepal, Communist Party, break and fragmented, as there is no cooperation among each, and each and everyone will pretends other, which finally turns collapse of the party. Similarly, for making the pertinaceous relationship, one should follow the principle of truth. We can also take an example of Mahatma Gandhi--due to his truth, he was able to made a success of the protest or movement called civil disobedience.

In conclusion, I am on the opinion that speaking the truth is one of the pre-requisite for the understanding and relationship between the allies. This is because, it helps to make durable connections between the friends circle, groups, organizations and because it make better understandings among these.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'exist'
Suggestion: exist
...egin with, any types of friendship will exists then, whenever there a truth and truste...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a parent' or simply 'parents'?
Suggestion: a parent; parents
...may be between the friends circle or in a parents. Truth is a kind of bond between two pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...eone, heard these types of things--in a little bit of sense, others used to ridicule. Othe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1056, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...iend while, others became a part at the some extent of life and breakthrough after s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... and organization will withstand to the period of time when there is maintainance of truth. Un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this truth' or 'these truths'?
Suggestion: this truth; these truths
...there is maintainance of truth. Unless, these truth doesnt remains, these groups and partie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ntainance of truth. Unless, these truth doesnt remains, these groups and parties will ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'pretend'
Suggestion: pretend
... among each, and each and everyone will pretends other, which finally turns collapse of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...e, groups, organizations and because it make better understandings among these.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02066115702 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89520761537 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526859504132 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4761744157 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9259259259 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195545351796 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544495177705 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041584739839 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111134766554 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321094671409 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.