Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The modern world has brought many unique changes and challenges. People have witnessed numerous incidents and events throughout the globe. Technology advances, political issues and wars are some of the examples. Many people need to be informed about those matters and with the advances in Information Technology, they have access to a wide variety of information sources. In order to be prepared for similar events, people need to follow the news from variety of resources so that they can compare the news and distinguish right from wrong. This essay will discuss this matter.
First of all, the concept of the global village has become increasingly popular among communities around the world. People are getting closer to each other and they can know about different events happening around them. Many countries have maintained economical relations to benefit from regular trades including agriculture and oil industries. There are many incidents happening in this world that people should know about, such as devastating earthquakes or terrible wars in the Middle East. Being informed about the reasons and consequences of such events, people can prepare themselves to avoid such results. Moreover, they can learn from other people's experiences to find the best possible solution. Therefore, people should have access to information resources to make well-informed decisions.
In addition, another significant point to indicate is that the media plays a crucial role in informing people about the mentioned events. They should create precise reports for people. TV channels can produce useful and informative programs based on many factors such as age, priority of news and people's interests. Also, there are numerous online resources which people can use to learn about the latest changes in the world. However, to be able to determine the facts, people need to investigate reasons and results using many news sources. This can assist them to compare and extract the facts. My own experience is a compelling example of this. A couple of years ago, a newspaper published a story about political corruption of a senator in my country. Having known him for many years, I did not believe the accusations at first, so I decided to do some research. After reviewing many newspapers and reports, I found out that the senator was innocent and the accusations were wrong. The other party wanted to demonstrate a bad image of that man for political purposes.
In conclusion, people need to be informed about recent changes in the world. They need to know about those events so that they can make better decisions for their lives. Moreover, they need to have access to a wide variety of sources to be able to distinguish the facts. The media has a significant role in shaping public awareness and people can choose which information sources are better for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...advances, political issues and wars are some of the examples. Many people need to be inform...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nd them. Many countries have maintained economical relations to benefit from regular trade...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ble to distinguish the facts. The media has a significant role in shaping public aw...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18574514039 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67787220348 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492440604752 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.192850226 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.75 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5357142857 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143657929017 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406532466847 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438098081645 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1004708997 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399287237092 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.