Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of humanity, occupation has been an important part of our lives. We spend most of our day on our career and it's a part of who we are. Some people believe that successful jobs were more notable in the past, but others have a negative attitude toward it. Personally, I believe recognizing what type of career leads to success is way easier nowadays. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, in this modern society that technology has advanced, job opportunities can be found easily. Without any daoubt, technology made our job market more competitive, but this doesn't mean that a professional person can not find a suitable job. Moreover, anyone can access to the internet and finds a lot of information about what kind of career and jobs are predicted to have a bright future. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I graduated from college, I had three options for my future, I could be a teacher, or I could go and work on a construction company or I could pursue my studies in my related field. I didn't know which one to choose; finally, I looked up in the internet and gain a lot of information about each opportunity and ended up choosing to work for that construction company. As you can see, I found the best career opportunity on the internet. Meanwhile, a few decades ago, this was not possible.
secondly, since the population of the earth is much more than the past, it's easier to find someone and ask them for advice about their career. Also, there are more types of career now than it was in the past. Everyone can find a job that is suitable for them and has the skill for it. For instance, thirty years ago when my father was looking to find a suitable career, he asked for advice from few people that he consider successful. He found out that only being a doctor can guarantee a successful future. However, today anyone with any job (for example engineer, pilot, driver, etc...) can be successful in her or his field.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that few decades ago, despite today, finding a career with a successful future was way harder. This is because today technology has advanced and finding o job is much easier, also, the variety of jobs is increasing in recent years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...spend most of our day on our career and its a part of who we are. Some people belie...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll explore in the following essay. First of all, in this modern society tha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r job market more competitive, but this doesnt mean that a professional person can not...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ursue my studies in my related field. I didnt know which one to choose; finally, I lo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecades ago, this was not possible. secondly, since the population of the ea...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...s ago, this was not possible. secondly, since the population of the earth is m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be successful in her or his field. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59708737864 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6125740508 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4245806264 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0909090909 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190431287479 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634639437716 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510935044535 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123665023936 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205962360468 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.