Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
In my opinion, I think it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subject than to specialize in one specific subject. It is possible to give several reasons for my opinion. If we consider the higher studies, the fields are becoming more interconnected. Thus knowing a wide array of topic can actually help an individual to prepare better for the higher studies rather then being specialized in one specific subject. For example, in the current competitive job environment, it is often seen that a person knowing several skills are valued over a person with one particular skill. In academic respect, I can share a personal experience. During my undergraduate studies, to understand how the heat is removed from the cutting zone of metal, I required to have the understanding of the basic of thermodynamics, mathematical model, metal characteristics. So, clearly the topics are getting more intertwined and having compund subject knowledge can help in the long run.
Secondly, having knowledge of different subjects can help in getting job more easily. In current scenario in higher studies, professors are expecting students to have knowledge of several different subjects as the professors' research works are also of composite subjects. For example, one student wanting to study ergonomics need to have the knowledge of how the muscle works in addition with the physics of movement and the biological impact of it. This illustrate the advantage of having knowledge of multiple subjects.
Moreover, getting specialized in one topic can sometimes be very limiting. For instance, there are many academic fields which are actually getting out of relevance. If someone specializes in that area, it is possible that the skill of that person might become irrelavent in future. This phenomenon could be understood if one just look at the situation after the industrial revolution which resulted in unemployemnet of many people due to their inability to shift from their previous specialization of manual work.
Although there are areas where specializing is important like academia, hospital, but in general scenario, now a days having comprehensive knowledge about multiple subjects can help an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...re better for the higher studies rather then being specialized in one specific subje...
^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...expecting students to have knowledge of several different subjects as the professors research wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... of that person might become irrelavent in future. This phenomenon could be understood if...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...mia, hospital, but in general scenario, now a days having comprehensive knowledge about mu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36389684814 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04743116829 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535816618911 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1808744809 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.117647059 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329697011104 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109862401175 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130826634805 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187437994731 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729005851923 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.