Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The modern society has witnessed an increasing emphasis on the interrelationship and interdependence between several subjects which are diametrically different from each other. Then the majority of people, especially the experts or professors in certain fields, advocate the interdisciplinary education and oppose specializing in one specific subject. From my perspective, the statement raises valid points for attaching great significance to the combination of diverse subjects. However, I definitely disagree with the opinion that the benefits of comprehensive knowledge of various academic subjects outweigh the ones of specializing in one specific subject since these two things are equally important.
For starters, there is every reason to believe that the broad knowledge of diversified academic subjects is extremely significant. Actually, the emergence of numerous interdisciplinary industry requires people to be proficient in different fields. For instance, industrial design makes demands on the professional knowledge of material science, engineering as well as art design in order to improve the basic function and appearance of the products. The same can also hold for the neuroscience, which combines diversified subjects like Physiology, Psychology and mathematical modeling. With the specific skills in various fields, Neuroscience can be well applied to the interpretation of human beings' behaviors and mental health through the research on nerve. Therefore, the importance of interdisciplinary learning is undeniable.
However, we should avoid taking the statement to the extreme since dedicating in one specific area also deserves the supports. Many subjects, especially chemistry and physics, require intense focus on the research. In this regard, we may refer to Madame Curie, one laureate of the Nobel Prize. Her enormous scientific research on radioactivity made her the first person honored with two Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry for her pioneering research on refining radium. Her unprecedented achievements owed much to her untiring efforts in the specific area. Hence, the importance of focusing on one subject should never be neglected.
In sum, the statement is unconvincing due to the equal importance of wide knowledge of various subjects and dedication in one specific subject.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily newspaper."Throughout the country last year, as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth-league sports, over 40,000 of these young players suffered inju 69
- Do you agree or disagree: The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character. 73
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles aw 73
- While scientists have been seriously observing animal behavior for well over a hundred years, the study of why animals play has only recently become a serious research topic. At least three different theories have been advanced to explain the phenomenon.T 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90828402367 4.8611393121 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33259696242 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5834912143 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.470588235 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285873674655 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086767635715 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894092920441 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192957621668 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745679120411 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 58.1214874552 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 10.9000537634 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.