Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Everyone wants a comfortable job, but what's the best work schedule always raise a debate. A minority of people hold that it's better to work 5 days a week for shorter hours because people may not be exhausted every day. I, however, believe that working 3 days a week for long hours is a better choice.
First, from the perspective of the boss, working 3 days a week for long hours helps the employees utilize time more efficiently. We can assume that all the work you need to finish is unchangeable, no matter which work style you choose. You can imagine that people tend to work more efficently providing that they can only work 3 days. When people need to work 5 days a week, they may think that they still have enough time to accomplish the task and may not try their best to solving the problems. However, they may make much more efforts to dealing with the work since they totally don't want to do anything about their jobs in the other 4 days in a week. This behavior will definitely increase the profits of the whole company and satisfy the leaders.
Second, from the perspective of the employees, working 3 days a week means that they can participate in some interesting acitivities that cost more than a weekend. If the employees need to work 5 days a week, they can't use the weekend to enjoy the best entertainment becuase only a weekend isn't enough for them to take a trip to enjoy the magnificent view, or to come back to their hometown to stay with their parents. However, provided that they have 4 days a week to relax themselves, these dreaming acitivities may come true. You can imagine that how happy people will be when they have enough time to handle with their things and exercise their own hobbies.
Admittedly, it's true that people may not be too tired if they choose to work 5 days per week. Working only three days to finishing the same tasks may be a great challenge and people may need to stay up until midnight every day to handle this. However, I still assert that people may feel this choice more satisfying because they have 2 more days per week to do anything they like, and don't need to work in an office boringly.
In brief, I advance the idea that working 3 days per week is more enjoyable because it can improve the efficiency and give people the chance to do something more interesting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
Everyone wants a comfortable job, but whats the best work schedule always raise a d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ealing with the work since they totally dont want to do anything about their jobs in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...loyees need to work 5 days a week, they cant use the weekend to enjoy the best enter...
^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...st entertainment becuase only a weekend isnt enough for them to take a trip to enjoy...
^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... per week to do anything they like, and dont need to work in an office boringly. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50235849057 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39765477968 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455188679245 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9538256954 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.294117647 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9411764706 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368205221296 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147361549929 0.076458572812 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059389553092 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238306874861 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564026205707 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.