Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

That in today`s hectic words, in general, people encounter many distressing and unsettling circumstances to four winds, it`s going without say that they need more free time and relaxation. A question which is a matter of debate. a controversial one, is whether it`s better to work only three days a week for long hours or five days for shorter time. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to great extent on the belief that it is better to have a job three days a week than five days to have more time free. In what follows I will delve into some conspicuous aspects which persuade me to put forward this perspective.

To commence, the first point I would like to make is that, if your work and free time is continuously, definitely it is more programmable than don`t. Let me illustrate this in other word. suppose you work five days a week, you can`t have a good and long term plan for your free time because tomorrow of that day you should go back to work, also when you are comeback from your job you are tire and need to recovery, but you don`t have much time to do lots of pastimes. On the other hand, if you have a job where you work three days, you have much more free time and you can implement each of your plan one by one.

Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, personally believe that if you focus on one thing steadily and separately, absolutely it`s better than you have all of them at one time. My personal experience is a compelling example of what I mean. I work since 8:00 am to 9:00 pm for three days a week at one company. Although it is too hard but when I`m tired I know that after these times I have many time to relax and enjoy. I work three days and then I have much more time to enjoy, making a trip, more time awake and in one word, I can plan everything that I want without limit time.

Drawing upon the reason, although there are always some exception which excluded from the general rule, I do agree that it`s more enjoyable to have a job where work only three days a week for long hours, but have much more free time to planning. To recapitulate the reasons, not only can people have more time to recovery, relax and enjoy, but also have an opportunity to planning without limit time.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...A question which is a matter of debate. a controversial one, is whether it's...
^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Suppose
.... Let me illustrate this in other word. suppose you work five days a week, you can&apos...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...ed I know that after these times I have many time to relax and enjoy. I work three days a...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, i mean, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42957746479 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4649463397 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464788732394 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5721017632 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9375 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462785884587 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157099707135 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143636905937 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316891844995 0.150856017488 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660499377187 0.0645574589148 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.