Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
In management literature, the term leadership is defined as the ability of a person to guide a group of people effectively toward a mutual goal that is beneficial for them. This ability comes from some critical characteristics which can determine the power of the leader and his popularity among others. In this regard, there has always been a controversial debate among people around the issue of whether the required features that make a person a qualified leader can be learned or these characteristics are inherent and leaders receive them as natural gifts. Personally speaking, I strongly believe that leadership is an instructable ability, and all the people can become leaders if educated correctly. Two reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are vindicated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays, many well-known business schools across the world are providing several courses and seminars to teach people how to become effective leaders. To be more specific, leadership and its required characteristics are comprehensively discussed in the management books and many prominent professors in this area, like Kotler or Keller, believe that this ability is gainable by people if they participate in appropriate classes. For example, one of the primary skills that a discreet leader must have is persuasion. When leaders are equipped with this powerful weapon, they can make their followers convinced in the times of implementing difficult decisions or in chaotic situations. In order to teach people to become convincing, educational institutions provide their students with psychological instructives about the human mind and show them some tricks and techniques to become compelling leaders in their future.
Moreover, the experience is one of the essential features for leadership, and people only could achieve that during years of hard work. Furthermore, one cannot claim that they have experience in their genes as a gift. Although there are prominent young businessmen in the contemporary era, like Mark Zuckerberg, that proved to have perfect leadership abilities, but even these young leaders have some well-experienced advisors around them to learn from and take guidance from them to lead their company and their employees in the correct way toward prosperity, and maximize their beneficiaries' profits. Therefore, the more experiences people gain in their life, the better they guide others under challenging situations, and the more influential leaders they become eventually.
In conclusion, considering all the abovementioned points and reasons into account, I firmly believe that leadership is a learnable ability not only because there are a variety of institutions that offer courses to turn their students into the future leaders, but also due to the fact that the more experienced people become, the more qualified leaders they turn to, and experience is not an inherent characteristic that people born with.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52759381898 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08569477012 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523178807947 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.173838791 48.9658058833 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.933333333 100.406767564 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169864620568 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633855317746 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240789897895 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104311353501 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304001521555 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 11.7677419355 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 58.1214874552 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.1575268817 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.