Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays, it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
Throughouthistory, the outstanding role of family and family members in every individual’s life has been undeniable. Regarding the importance of the issue, a wide variety of aspects of familiy have been assessed and discussed by scholars for decades. Accordingly, an unavoidable question that always has been the topic of controversy and brought about debates is wethere it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together in this ere. I adhere to the idea that it is still important for people to do so. In what follows, two conspicuous reasons will vindicate my standpoint.
The first remarkable aspect to point out is that reduction of stress and anxiety is of the desirable advantages of having family meals. It is crystal clear that in this hectic world people are exposed to a lot of pressure and stress which is very harmful for them. As a result, people are usually tired and bored from their regular life naming job or school activities, and obviously, they are in favore of having activitiest that help them be less stressed-out. Despite seeming not very joyful and stress-releaving at the first glance, spending time with family is capable of refreshing people to the point of forgetting completely about difficulties of daily life since family members are familiar with characteristics of each other and can provide one with ether solutions for their problems or propper distractive activities. The statistics revealed by a currently conduccted research in my country indicate that people who insist on regularly family activities are aout 60 percent less likely to get heart diseases.
Moreover, it should be taken into account that not only does having regularly family meals decrease stress and risk of diseases, but it also escalates life-satisfaction. Indeed, life is not only about working and trying. Willin to have a high-quality life and job performance, ther has to be fun and intertainment in one’s life. Accordingly, having regularly family meals which is full of laughter and positive discussions can be a real intertainment. In addition, having times that seprate us from the professional life incrase our proficiency at work becouse maks us more energitic. This especial activity has an additional advantage which is gainig teamwork skills due to the cooporation that is required to prepare meals. For the matter of illustration, I used to live alone and have my meals at work. I was deppressed at that period. Once I happened to be off for meals a whole week. After that week I was a lot more energitic a my performance elevated suprisingly.
In conclusion, I belive that people care for having regularly family meals together based on a myriad of reasons only two of which were discussed above. Conswquently, it is highly recommended that people choose jobs that let them have their meals with their families.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 895, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pened to be off for meals a whole week. After that week I was a lot more energitic a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 938, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'my'?
Suggestion: a; my
...er that week I was a lot more energitic a my performance elevated suprisingly. In ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14102564103 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08292017062 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534188034188 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7345172247 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.363636364 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313749047842 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921501306009 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718674520771 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214854851023 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476710639768 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.