Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

First, technology itself promote innovations which is a direct result of creativity. For instance, the invention of computer led to the creative innovation of networking tools that is used to promote global civilization and development in the world today. When I was in primary school, there was no social media, but through technology, a child known as Mark Zukerberg was able to creatively invent the "Facebook". Facebook is used all over the world today as a means of communication and development. Mark learnt how to create this media because he had access to to a computer which is a modern result of technology. Facebook has also led to other creative innovations bymany other children, such innovatons includes artificial intelligence and robotics that are essential for national developement.

Second, technology provides the exposure and knowledge needed for creativity. For instance, when I was in the university, I was given an assignment to paint an image of 'Monalisa'. At that time I had never seen a painting of Monalisa, so I used my computer to browse about the various paintings of Monalisa, I got images online of various paintings of Monalisa from different painters, and the techniques used by these painters were profoundly discussed, this event helped me to paint a portait that was outstanding, because I was able to combine the various techniques I learnt online. My results was graded by my professor as the most creative. A child who was born in the early seventies migh not have access to a computer like I did, and as such might not be able to learn and express creatively like I did. Therefore, technology gives children the optimum ability to be creative compared to the past.

In conclusion, others might agree that technology makes children less creative that they were in the past, but I belief technology increases the creative capacity of children. Not only does it provide exposure and knowledge needed for creativity, it also naturally promotes innovation which is a direct resultant of creativity. Therefore, every society should ensure that it supports more technological innovations in other to increase the creative capacity of their children.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvent the 'Facebook'. Facebook is used all over the world today as a me...
^^
Line 1, column 573, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...create this media because he had access to to a computer which is a modern result of ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 114, Rule ID: BELIEF_BELIEVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believe' (verb) instead of belief (noun)?
Suggestion: believe
...ative that they were in the past, but I belief technology increases the creative capac...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21690140845 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10890217976 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0676380735 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.466666667 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130153556514 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053717831841 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845491084892 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109332102611 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827504681247 0.0645574589148 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.