Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Throughout the history, in all civilized societies, the issue of people's happiness engendered copious controversies among people. Some incline toward the opinion that it is vital for students to make many new friends easily. Some others, however, may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the ability to preserve your friendships is more essential. As far as I am concerned, the skill that help people to maintain your old friends is more important. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point is that people can have deep relationship with their friend. when juveniles meet up with strange and new people they can not understand them well because they do not have information about him. On the other hand, old friend are familiar with each other behaviuor. Also they have a same interest. For example, after four years study in university I become friends with my dorm mate and now both of us are trying to continue our education abroad. It is an arduous task to achieve it but we motivate each other every weak and it make us feel confidence.
The second significant reason supporting my idea is that people can trust to their old friend. There is a quote that say old friends are the best friends in the world. When a person meets up with a new person he cannot trust him because he do not know anything about him. On the other hands, an old friend are trustworthy. For instance, one of my old friend have a problem in school. His parent wanted to get divorce and he was upset because of that. He needed someone who trust and talk about it and he always talk to me and I try to comfort him. One of the reasons he talked to me was that I did not tell anybody else and I keep his secret. Hence, by this way my friend become happy.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned argument, old friends are more crucial than new friends since they know each other profoundly and they are royal and trustworthy. Consequently, it is highly recommended that, people keep their touch with their old friend because they are like a diamnod which valued a lot. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ve deep relationship with their friend. when juveniles meet up with strange and new ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...are familiar with each other behaviuor. Also they have a same interest. For example,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...e motivate each other every weak and it make us feel confidence. The second signifi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...w person he cannot trust him because he do not know anything about him. On the oth...
^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'talks'.
Suggestion: talks
...o trust and talk about it and he always talk to me and I try to comfort him. One of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63861386139 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54796165921 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537128712871 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5012539173 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4782608696 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5652173913 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250725276658 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655138499359 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469213764976 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154866412978 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503298899805 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.