Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Throughout the history, in all civilized societies, the issue of people's happiness engendered copious controversies among people. Some incline toward the opinion that it is vital for students to make many new friends easily. Some others, however, may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the ability to preserve your friendships is more essential. As far as I am concerned, the skill that help people maintain their old friends is more important. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point is that people can have deep relationship with their friend. when juveniles meet up with strange and new people they can not understand them well because they do not have information about them. On the other hand, old friend are familiar with each others behaviour and have a same interest. For example, after four years study in university I become friends with my dorm mate and now both of us are trying to continue our education abroad. One the requriment ot studying internationally is to get a high score in a toefl exam. It is obvious that it is an arduous task to achieve it and sometime both of us become exhausted but we try to think positive and motivate each other.
The second significant reason supporting my idea is that people can trust to their old friend. There is a quate that say old friends are the best friends in the world. When a person meets up with a new person he cannot trust him because he does not know anything about him. On the other hands, an old friend are familiar with each other. Hence, they are trustworthy. For instance, when a person have a problem and he do not want that other people find out about his problem, he can trust to his old friend which are trustworthy and since he is loyal, he is not going to tell his secret to other people. Therefore, he is going to feel supported and happy.
to make a long story short, based on the aforementioned argument, old friends are more crucial that new friends since they know each other profoundly and they are loyal and trustworthy. Consequently, it is highly recommended that, people keep their touch with their old friend which valued a lot. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ve deep relationship with their friend. when juveniles meet up with strange and new ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...hand, old friend are familiar with each others behaviour and have a same interest. For...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...ce, when a person have a problem and he do not want that other people find out abo...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... is going to feel supported and happy. to make a long story short, based on the a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73284313725 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62463152611 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524509803922 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8370870448 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9523809524 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239480000046 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684823688246 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046345612819 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152842159171 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485898669829 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.