Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many ne friends easily.
In todays evey person needs friend in every stage of life. A controversial question arise in this issue, which of friends more provide happiness for people. Some people old and prolonged friends more reliable and dependable for them, conversely, other belief opposite side this topic. My oppinion, I subscribe first idea, and hereunder is explained my notion about it.
First and foremost, when every person and heman confron with some predicament and inclement situation in the during of span of their life. With this respect, an old and long period friends can be more reliable and dependable as a shelter for people. Because this friend know every trait of their friend and can comprehend this situation, which cuase help rescue them from this disaster position. On the other hand, new friend oblivious with their trait even more useless for this situation. In the emperical study from Asia contient says that, an old friend more helpful in solving problem which arise in their life than other people who opposite side this topic
Secondly, the most of the work and business activeity need more loyal and faithful collaborate in between people to reach their goal and making pave the way to prosperous. Therefore, this coorpative is required not only more old friends but more strong raletionship between them as well. As staistic study from business old friendship in the every task more be posperos and they can get more accomplish and achive in this coorpativetion
All in all, in my opinion, more loyal and dependable for every people than new friend who are even arose some difficultis in the raletionship and more disaster
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more provide happiness for people. Some people old and prolonged friends more re...
^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lem which arise in their life than other people who opposite side this topic Sec...
^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a opposite'.
Suggestion: who is a opposite
... arise in their life than other people who opposite side this topic Secondly, the most of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orpativetion All in all, in my opinion, more loyal and dependable for every peop...
^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re loyal and dependable for every people than new friend who are even arose some...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndable for every people than new friend who are even arose some difficultis in t...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...y people than new friend who are even arose some difficultis in the raletionship an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 271.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0479704797 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5273170215 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523985239852 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.7223359282 48.9658058833 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.363636364 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181336780836 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845762717745 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512620230694 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121245824957 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176928635336 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.