Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I have an excellent experience about long-term friendships and I absolutely agree with this kind of friendship. In my perspective, people feel more happiness when they have small number of people as friends over a long period of time than some guys who are interested to hang out with different new people easily. Indeed, long-lasting friendships have many advantages which makes people extremely happy. I would like to reinforce my opinion by following aspects.
First of all, we have a lot of memories with our old friends. Which means that we are in common more with our older friends than our new friends. As an example, me and my close friends started our friendship from childhood. Apparently, we have lots of happy memories. Sometimes, when we gather with each other, we going to tell those memories and make funny moments. I really enjoy about that. In contrast, I have not eye-catching funny memories with my new friends. Since we have not been with each other for so long.
Moreover, we can trust our older friends more than our new friends. Actually, since we grew up with each other, we know every behavior of each other. For instance, I met a student in the first day of the university last year, about three month later we were hanging out as friends. I said some complains about one of our professors to her. Unfortunately, in the last session of our class, I aware that she told my complains to our professor. It was awkward for me. So, I think long-term friendships are more reliable than new friendships.
Last but not least, older friends can help you more to addressing your difficulties in your life. They know you best and are familiar with your situation, So, they can help you to overcome with your problems. Indeed, they can relax you and give you some advices to improve your situations. Old friends are like your family members. They have an ability to keep you calm and make you happy.
Thus, I think the ability to maintain friendships with small number of people over a long time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. I always try to keep my close friends because I think they have a significant role in my life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...number of people as friends over a long period of time than some guys who are interested to ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a lot of memories with our old friends. Which means that we are in common more with o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...f the university last year, about three month later we were hanging out as friends. I...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, first, if, moreover, really, so, thus, for instance, i think, in contrast, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7012987013 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5922494336 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47012987013 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.017766025 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6153846154 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8076923077 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73076923077 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361652784874 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102740155124 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132860425909 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238880815841 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136007094389 0.0645574589148 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.