Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays people can use various methods for communication while doing a project. These methods include face to face conversations, emailing or using tools like Skype. However, the impact of each of these methods on the final delivery of the projects is a point of discussion. Some people believe that in person communication is more effective, but I think that is not always the case.
The face to face communication gives the group-mates and colleagues a chance to each express their ideas, explain them clearly and in some cases justify them. They could also hear clearly other people feedbacks. During these in person communications, the group can make critical and appropriate decisions more accuratly and more rapidly. Also, if some of the team members is facing an issue, it could be discussed and solved rapidly. However, these meeting can be truly time-consuming and they can spoil most of the members concentration and working time and also might not be effective in case of absence of some team members.
On the other hand, matters can be discussed via Email between team members. By using emails, matters can be discussed fastly. The Email could be addressed to the related people, no matter where they are, and so other people of the team would not be distracted by the email beeps and the extra information that may get in the face to face meetings. However, it is not easy to explain all details and aspects in the email as it may get too long and sometimes unclear to understand.
Using both emails and face to face communications can have both good and bad effects on the outcome of the team project. However, I believe that the most effective way of communication in group works, could be a mix of both: Face to face meeting in certain milestones or in case of emergencies and Emails for the potential minor problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling or using tools like Skype. However, the impact of each of these methods on t...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...re accuratly and more rapidly. Also, if some of the team members is facing an issue, it cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...onsuming and they can spoil most of the members concentration and working time and also...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, i think, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86349206349 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75296125407 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8598146043 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080201533304 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349321743 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399552767032 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588457157392 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038422883375 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.