Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, a prime and fundamental controversy on the issue whether face to face or internet based communication is more effective. Some people would claim that meeting in person can result in a better cooperation. However, as far as I am concerned, I agree that modern life relies on far distance working and this model of working can help each individual for two following reasons.

The first and foremost reason that I prefer to illustrate is meeting in person is not easy as it was before and everybody is busy with his/her life. A relevant example can shed light on this assertion. 3 years ago, when I was working in an international artistic project for the Fringe festival, always had problems to visit the colleagues who was living in the same city. On the other hand, there was professional artist from Europe and the US that usually were available in a virtual net-based application of the event. Hence, the artists who were living in the same region as me couldn't manage to make an appointment to talk about local aspects of the artistic program.

Another reason that should be taken into account is that we can get access to a great range of information while we visit a person on the internet or work in a web-based shared place. For instance, according to a recent research study at George Washington University young generation wants the get information by Google and other types of search engines more than anytime before. Moreover, experts in GWU believe that people can work on complex duties when they are connected to the internet. Consequently, novel types of communication can lead us to a better condition in every workplace.

To sum up, I firmly believe in far distance working and using suitable traits of the internet to reaching to a convenient workplace for two main reason, first, these days, most of the people are busy enough to cancel their meetings in person. What is more, while we meet a classmate via the internet and transform information with that person we can benefit from the internet.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ho were living in the same region as me couldnt manage to make an appointment to talk a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84770114943 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72539103775 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0527819126 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187158785355 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595003500319 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312122765497 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105195723343 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00972012346139 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.