Do you agree or disagree?
One can learn a lot about a person from the books and movies that he likes.
Nowadays, despite the many disparities people have in a wide array of areas so far as one's opinion goes, one point that almost everybody agrees upon is the importance of knowing people's characteristics. This is owing to the fact that determining one's characteristics could guide us how should we treat them. That being said, in this regard, different opinions might stir heated debate as to by which way could we know one's personality. One particularly reoccurring idea brought up is that movies a person watches or books he reads are the good indicators for his personality. Many utterly repudiate this notion and I count myself as one of them. In what follows, the rationale for this thesis will be elaborated by focusing on two reasons.
First and foremost, people usually watch a movie or read a book to find something they miss. It is the pivotal function of literature and cinema to make us feel as if we are who we desire. As Sadegh Hedayat, the prominent Iranian writer, said:"Literature is the only means that make us believe we are those who we always envied." Take an elementary teacher who is also the father of three children as an instance. Regarding the current economic condition, he might desire to have a better job with higher adventure and salary. He even might want to have the time to attend pilotage courses and became a military pilot but obviously, he cannot. By watching the move' Above the Frozen Sea", which is about a courageous pilot whose plane stuck in the North Pole, the teacher could put his mind at ease and deal with his rudimentary life. In other words, the type of movie he watches is not correspondence with his personality in real life.
The other reason which deserves some words here is the fact that so complicated one's personality is that could not be learned by the type of their favorite movies and books. There are a plethora of factors which contribute to one's characteristics; their beloved cinema or literature genre is not sufficient enough for learning about them. One of the best examples by whom I would like to explain my argument is Dr. Haniball, the main character of the Haniball book series. He was a brutal serial killer but he highly appreciated art, he listened to classical music, he loved french cinema and his favorite writer was Dante. Having all these information in mind, one might reach the conclusion that Hannibal is a pure gentleman but on the contrary, he was a serial killer.
In summary, based on the aforementioned reasons, it seems more judicious to say that rarely can we learn about a person by knowing their favorite books or movies because both people usually looking for the movies different from their actual life and one's personality is too complicated to be determined by movies and books they like.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...have in a wide array of areas so far as ones opinion goes, one point that almost eve...
^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s is owing to the fact that determining ones characteristics could guide us how shou...
^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...debate as to by which way could we know ones personality. One particularly reoccurri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...plethora of factors which contribute to ones characteristics; their beloved cinema o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...s favorite writer was Dante. Having all these information in mind, one might reach the conclusion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...es different from their actual life and ones personality is too complicated to be de...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, regarding, so, as to, in summary, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82744282744 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82935761262 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550935550936 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.654829241 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.210526316 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3157894737 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269674356339 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777411175162 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680460035771 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179676952634 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705481424014 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.