do you like to have a meeting face to face or using online technologies?
Team working has a lot of advantages over the other reasons because it could help you gather the needed information, organize, and succeed in an efficient way. Among the two methods face to face sessions and long distance communication using modern facilities, I prefer to use new methods. Although in face to face sessions??? one can see other coworkers and hear their ideas conceretely, yet I hold the idea that using e-mail due to some reasons such asdifficulty in settng an appointment with other peers, a better way of documentation in e-mails, and the ability to be available when someone is in a far place, to name but a few.
To begin with, When people try to meet each other and disscus the topic of their project, they should coordinate a meeting which every one could partcipate in. This problem becomes worse if there is a large number of members in the group. On the contrary, by using e-mail, one can contact with every member in any time in everywhere you want and they can answer you easily.
The other advantage of using e-mail over face to face communication is that any comment and data will be documented in an appropriate way/method which could help you when you want to accomplish the project. In this way, no comments will be lost, because all of theme are available on the safe servers in contrast to oral communication which may be forgotten after the session.
Above all, by using email, group members can travel to other places to gather precious information in order to heighten/ better harvest the results of the project. This broadens the boarders of working environment from a room or even a city ro all over the world. Also you can get handful advices from other professors all around the world to better convey the results of the project.
To sum it all up, using new facilities could help people reach their goals in a convenient way compared to the traditional methods. Internet and e-mail have helped people all over the world to be in contact and do their projects in a better way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eded information, organize, and succeed in an efficient way. Among the two methods face to face ses...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...s. Although in face to face sessions??? one can see other coworkers and hear their ...
^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... This problem becomes worse if there is a large number of members in the group. On the contrary, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...any comment and data will be documented in an appropriate way/method which could help you when you wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 264, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...m or even a city ro all over the world. Also you can get handful advices from other ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 76, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convenient way" with adverb for "convenient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ies could help people reach their goals in a convenient way compared to the traditional methods. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72112676056 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61509511791 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52676056338 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5102875382 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211065324638 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861718944028 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988938966493 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112360133003 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580684131065 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.