Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?
Students, when they want to take a course always pay attention who will teach material. In this regard, many students, based on their experience or viewpoint, maintain specific directions toward this statements. Many prefer to take a course taught by a professor whose classes they have attended before, while others believe that it is better to experience classes with a professor with whom they have not had class before. I am unanimous with the first group, believing it is more beneficial to take courses taught by a familiar professor. I feel this way because of two main reasons, which I will explore in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, the privilege of familiar professor is that you know her/ his procedure well enough, and face less problems. Otherwise stated, after at least one course, students become familiar with the way professor convey the concepts, and what they can do to increase their efficiency, and get a good grade.
Secondly, if you perform well after two or more courses, you can benefit in some ways including some recommendation for graduate program in a good public university, or recommendation to find an on-campus job. Actually, professors at the university usually do not recommend students for their colleagues at other universities unless they ensure that the student will perform well. Otherwise stated, professors are caution about their reputation. For example, my supervisor Prof. Ahmadi just recommend students who have had at least two courses with, and get a high grade because he is famous among universities and does not take any risk about this issue.
In conclusion, according to what I mentioned above, I prefer to take course taught by a familiar professor because not only do I face less problem due to being familiar with the teaching methods, but I will have a better chance to get some recommendation from the professor as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nt, maintain specific directions toward this statements. Many prefer to take a cours...
^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...er/ his procedure well enough, and face less problems. Otherwise stated, after at le...
^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...re well enough, and face less problems. Otherwise stated, after at least one course, stud...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...ure that the student will perform well. Otherwise stated, professors are caution about th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, at least, for example, i feel, in conclusion, you know, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79969003638 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6707888272 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355404145473 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11406561761 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11802031205 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209918984058 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770041444524 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.