During our careers we work with many different kinds of people All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits In your opinion which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker a serious attitude regarding their work

Essay topics:

During our careers, we work with many different kinds of people. All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits. In your opinion, which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker?

a serious attitude regarding their work obligations
a willingness to learn new things
the ability to make other people laugh

It is critical important to have an ability and different people require different characteristics to work with others. Personally, I believe the most important traits of a coworker is a serious attitude regarding their wok obligations. There are two reasons which I will explore more in the following essay make me feel this way.

To begin with, work with people having responsibility and a serious attitude toward the jobs could make the task more efficient. The vibe of the team might be serious focus on the works which lead to using less time to do large amount of the works. Myself experience is a best illustration of this, I have an internship when I was in college. My group should build a website of introducing the company. My coworker, John, is a hardworking person and take everything about works seriously. Working with him makes me under lots of pressure and keep challenging myself which I never thought I could breakthrough. We worked for ten hours a day and John did all of his work perfectly that let my part of the works easier to achieve. He had a principle about the works, which is no tasks of today could be unfinished before the day end. It truly influenced me and boosted my efficiency. At last, we finished the website earlier than the deadline.

Secondly, having the serious attitude of the jobs could bring less problem to other. Nowadays, lots of jobs need to be accomplished by a group of people. If the coworker who is very careless of the works and keep delaying the whole process of the tasks, it would make the group debacle. For example, my father works at the big company. His coworker is a lazy person and indifferent with his jobs. When he gets to work, he often watched YouTube and some films or even just disappeared without telling anyone in the company. He postponed his works and never seem to finished. My father should help him to finish his portion of the jobs and working until midnight to make the process keep going. Ultimately, my father quite the job and the group was dismissed.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that the most important characteristic of coworker is having a serious attitude toward their work obligations. Because the attitude could influence the whole group vibe and boost the member’s potential and could bring less problems to others.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ount of the works. Myself experience is a best illustration of this, I have an in...
^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the member’s potential and could bring less problems to others.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80049875312 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71852248249 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506234413965 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6648267111 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2083333333 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7083333333 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332064891908 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916532793073 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950551270294 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236617151849 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898096998178 0.0645574589148 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.