Following are three choices to protect the local environment. Which one do you think is the best and explain why.
1. Plant trees and create gardens
2. Local shops do not provide consumers with plastic bags
3. Take public transportation and reduce the use of private cars on local roads
There are some moot points about the best ways which help the environment to the local community. The question of which activities are more beneficial has aroused as a subject of controversy among environmentalist. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that increasing the access to public transportation is the best way for helping to the environment. I have some reason, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that researches show that air pollution due to personals cars and automobiles is the significant factor which damages the environment. To be more specific, these cars use the fossil fuels which emit the carbon dioxide to the air consequently, co2 lead to various devastation on the environment, therefore, decreasing the personal automobiles give rise to decreasing the co2 emission. As a case to the point, I vividly remember two days ago I watched a program about air pollution and the ways for solving this phenomenon, in that program scientists asserted that using public transportation is the best ways for decreasing the air pollution. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that soaring the access to public transportation is very helpful for our environment.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that in addition to carbon dioxide, cars emission have some detrimental materials which are very destructive for the environment. One of the most momentous substance is sulfate which leads to acidic rain. This rain ruins the trees and plants and damages the soil. Sulfuric acid weaken the soil and diminish the plant growing thus, has bad impact on the environment. My personal experience demonstrates this reality I have lived in Tehran the capital of Iran for many years. Owing to increasing the acidic rain in This city most of the green space in this city, moreover, this acidic rain leads to erosion which is very catastrophic for the soil. My personal example shed some light on the point that cars emission are very harmful to the environment.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, if people want to help to the environment it is better to increase access to public transportation because personal cars emit the substances which not only lead to air pollution but also damage soil fertilizing aspects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10421836228 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02394559014 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491315136476 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3707722642 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5625 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1875 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132003637925 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050497934109 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294269750304 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845706803763 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310322973367 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.