Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
There are some moot points about which way is better for traveling. The question of whether travel by companion better that travel alone, has aroused as a subject of controversy among people. Whet it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the viewpoint that traveling by companion has more benefits. I have some reason, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that travel agencies have vast knowledge about where we travel. To be more specific, they choose the best restaurant, the best place for accommodation, the best museum and etc. As a result, when we travel with a companion, we experience an enjoyable trip. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a student at the university, I decided to go to Turkey for summer vacation. I traveled by myself, therefore, I did not know much information about that country and missed many things on that trip. For instance, I could not try Iskandar kebab which is delicious food in turkey because I did not any knowledge about famous foods in that country. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that traveling by agencies have more advantage rather than travel alone.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned is that travel companion has tour leaders thus, they can help us in each situation. As a consequence, we have a counselor on our trip. These leaders help us to choose everything in the best manner. My personal experience demonstrates this reality, my friend and I decide to go to China for bringing some apparatus for our corporation. Due to we don’t have any knowledge about China cities, we hire a tour leader to help us with this trip. This leader has great information about China and knows in which cities we can reach our goals.
Moreover, give rise to more traveler who travels by this companion, they can take some discounts in hotels and restaurants. If we travel alone we cannot take any discount from this place. Hence, make a journey by these agencies are cost-effectiveness. My personal experience shed some light to the point that travel by agencies is very fruitful.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, I totally agree with traveling by companions. These companies not only help us to have a better trip but also, they take more discounts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...bout which way is better for traveling. The question of whether travel by companion better that travel ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...lace for accommodation, the best museum and etc. As a result, when we travel with a comp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'traveler' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: traveler
...each our goals. Moreover, give rise to more traveler who travels by this companion, they can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me discounts in hotels and restaurants. If we travel alone we cannot take any disc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, as a result, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85817307692 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84095870552 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4542675216 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8695652174 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0869565217 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198250568645 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658675562167 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581488200713 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128649723651 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061779524557 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.