The government is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the government should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Arts and protection of our environment are very important things in our generation. Each one has their own value. But protecting our environment should be our main focus right now and I will be talking a little bit about it in the next paragraphs.
Our environment has suffered for a lot of years. Since last century until now, the Humanity has produced so much garbage, spent a lot of energy, cut trees, and polluted the Ocean. That are just a few examples of what we have done to our Earth. And we should stop it. We need to protect the place we live.
Although, the Art is so important and can lead people to a great place of imagination and ludic, the environment is screaming for help. A good example is the Global Warming. Places like Antarctica are melting and animals are dyeing as a result of the heat. Polar bears are suffering and struggling to survive in a place whom use to be the perfect habitat for them. One of the sad thing is, if the Earth keep getting warm, some animals are going to be extinct in few decades. If not few years.
The government has power to influence people decisions. And if worked for a good cause, can bring good results. One example of a Organization who are focus on protection is WWF. They exist for a few decades and have done a great job. If real organizations, like WWF, who is focus on saving the world, could rely on the government and both work together, we could have an awareness of the population even faster.
In conclusion, protect the environment should be an attitude of every human being. And if the government start spend some money for this cause, we will have some strong results in a showt period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...rotecting our environment should be our main focus right now and I will be talking a littl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...focus right now and I will be talking a little bit about it in the next paragraphs. Our...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...d struggling to survive in a place whom use to be the perfect habitat for them. One...
^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...are going to be extinct in few decades. If not few years. The government has po...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... can bring good results. One example of a Organization who are focus on protectio...
^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... results. One example of a Organization who are focus on protection is WWF. They exist ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ill have some strong results in a showt period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50819672131 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55012844105 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4839305355 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.4761904762 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5238095238 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.45110844103 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126782006714 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373932039885 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344176951005 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752308625112 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363714993516 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 11.7677419355 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.